Philosophy professor Nathan Nobis applies the tools of logic and critical thinking to common arguments about abortion, examining questions of human life, personhood, moral rights, and bodily autonomy. He argues that many familiar arguments on both sides are incomplete—and makes his case for why abortion should remain legal.

A practicing OBGYN argues that there is no such thing as a “medically necessary abortion.” This article explores what he means, how life-threatening pregnancy complications are treated, and whether abortion bans prevent doctors from providing life-saving care.

Some women do not realize they are pregnant until well into pregnancy, while others face financial, geographic, or personal barriers that delay an abortion. This post examines the factors associated with second-trimester abortions and asks how pro-life efforts can reduce both later abortions and abortions overall.

What does culture misunderstand about abortion and reproductive rights? This article examines seven common assumptions involving equality, healthcare, pregnancy support, sexual freedom, viability, and human rights, offering a Christian pro-life response centered on truth, compassion, and practical action.

The views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of the Abortion Museum. However, we do post content from both sides of the issue in order to foster intelligent discourse. The short answer to the title question: “Is Abortion Eugenics?” is: Yes, abortion (i.e., contemporary abortion-choice policy) can qualify as eugenics wherever a children-in-utero is intentionally terminated for any number of reasons deemed ‘defects’ in the child. Preliminary reasons for th