Roe v. Wade did not emerge from a neutral search for constitutional clarity, but from a case built on fragile facts, exploited plaintiffs, and a legal theory the Court itself acknowledged would fail if unborn children were recognized as persons. The decision produced a sweeping national abortion regime that went far beyond resolving the personal situations of the women involved.

The named plaintiff “Jane Roe” was Norma McCorvey, a poor 21-year-old Texas woman who sought an abortion when state law prohibited it. She lacked the financial means to travel elsewhere, and rather than helping her obtain an abortion, the lawyers who recruited her used her circumstances to advance a broader legal agenda. McCorvey was kept largely uninvolved in the case, ultimately carried her pregnancy to term, and placed her child for adoption.

The companion case, often overlooked, involved “Mary Doe,” whose real name was Sandra Cano. She was a poor 22-year-old woman in Georgia who later stated she never wanted an abortion at all. She claimed her name was added to legal paperwork without her true consent and fled her home to protect her unborn child. Like McCorvey, her personal wishes were disconnected from how the case bearing her name was used.

Despite these facts, the Supreme Court used the cases to impose a nationwide abortion framework. The Court created an arbitrary trimester system and paired it with an expansive “health” exception so broad that it could justify abortion late in pregnancy for almost any reason. The ruling stretched an undefined notion of “privacy” into a constitutional right to end prenatal human life, while openly conceding that if unborn children were recognized as persons under the Fourteenth Amendment, the legal basis for abortion would collapse entirely.

Rather than settling the abortion debate, Roe v. Wade entrenched it—by resting on legally unstable reasoning, ignoring the realities of the plaintiffs’ lives, and constitutionalizing a moral question the Court admitted it could not resolve if fetal personhood were acknowledged.

CORNER

CONVERSATION